gyrogami logo



Gyrogami Blog - Precious Metals, Jewelry, Artwork


Testing for Silver - Part 2
Blog Entry Index
   
Categories: Instruction and information

Word count/read time: 1292 words; 6 minutes

Aside from the fire assay test or refining, no singular test is absolutely conclusive. They are always used together.


Key Definitions and Explanations

Destructivity - 1-10 scale: 1 is non-destructive, 10 is annihilation
Difficulty - 1-10 scale: 1 is easy, 10 is prohibitive
Accessibility - 1-10 scale: 1 is accessible, 10 requires government clearance
Equipment Cost - Equipment or supplies necessary; in dollars
Service Cost - Cost to have a facility do it for you; in dollars
Effectiveness - 1-10 scale: 1 is unreliable, 10 is foolproof
Value - 1-10 scale: 1 is essentially useless, 10 is worth it
Explanation - Description of the test

NOTE: The ratings assume the testing is done properly!


Index of Testing Methods - Destructive



Hardness

Destructivity - 6
Difficulty - 3
Accessibility - 5
Equipment Cost - $900
Service Cost - $50
Effectiveness - 3
Value - 3
Explanation
Silver has a Mohs rating of 2.5 for dead-soft to maybe 3.5 to 4 for work-hardened pieces. Lead has a rating of 1.5. The fake silver alloys, aside from lead-based ones, will usually be harder. Most of us don't have access to sophisticated testing equipment but common sense and some known purity samples help identify fakes.


PROS: Not many; it will rule out some fakes but don't bank on this test

CONS: Testing equipment is somewhat expensive; will slightly damage piece since it leaves a divot; does not detect the presence of silver


Flame Method, v1

Destructivity - 6
Difficulty - 2
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $40
Service Cost - n/a
Effectiveness - 5
Value - 9
Explanation
This differs from the heat or cold test listed in Part 1. Primarily useful for lead-based bars, it will destroy them. If a bar is lead-filled or primarily composed of lead it will melt away long before it should. Filled bars can be dangerous since the core may turn liquid or gas before the outside melts, potentially exploding. The color of the metal after heating can indicate the presence of some elements as seen in the next test.


PROS: Inexpensive

CONS: Can damage the piece; does not detect the presence of silver


Flame Method, v2

Destructivity - 7
Difficulty - 2
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $40
Service Cost - n/a
Effectiveness - 6
Value - 9
Explanation
This differs from version 1 due to the amount of heat you will be applying to the piece. Use it only after it passes version 1. Pure silver will not tarnish or discolor when heated with an air-aspirated flame. As the presence of non-silver metals increases, the piece will change colors (oxidize) as it gets hotter. Heat it to red hot for this effect to be pronounced. Pure silver will have, at most, a white coating on it after water quenching but lesser purities will have more coloring.


PROS: Inexpensive

CONS: Can damage the piece but at the very least, it will anneal it; doesn't detect the presence of silver


Acid Test, Drop Method

Destructivity - 4
Difficulty - 3
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $10
Service Cost - $15
Effectiveness - 7
Value - 9
Explanation
The acid test is a popular and reliable home method but most people incorrectly use it though 100% of them think they are right! The acid always turns red on a silverplated item. Wipe it off and repeat six or seven times in the same spot, letting the acid sit for 15-30 seconds each iteration. If it is still red, it is silver or the thickest plating known to man. Regarding silverplated turning red, a simple analogy is testing particle board for the presence of wood. Burning a small piece will absolutely smell like wood but it is particle board, not solid wood. Ergo, the presence of silver on the surface means it is silverplated, nothing more.


PROS: Simple to use and accurate when done correctly; inexpensive; readily available; the most common test

CONS: Acid must be fresh; potential damage to the piece; bad testers will think everything and a pile of rusty nails is silver


Acid Test, Scratch/Gouge Method

Destructivity - 7
Difficulty - 4
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $10
Service Cost - $15
Effectiveness - 7
Value - 9
Explanation
The gouge method tests some shavings from the piece. There is no going back. The scratch test, while not as damaging as the gouge method, requires rubbing the piece against a test stone to which the acid is added. Silverplating will give a positive test if the underlying base metal isn't reached. If the scratch spot is carefully chosen, it can be hidden with a little polishing or TLC.


PROS: Simple to use and accurate when done correctly; inexpensive; readily available; the most common test

CONS: Acid must be fresh; potential damage to the piece; easy to do a false-positive test


Dissection - Cut into Pieces or Drilling

Destructivity - 10
Difficulty - 5
Accessibility - 3
Equipment Cost - $15
Service Cost - $20
Effectiveness - 5
Value - 8
Explanation
The last resort would be to drill or cut the piece for a visual inspection. Take a sample from the middle of the piece and use an acid test or one of the other testing methods. Use them all if necessary.


PROS: There are no secrets when it is sliced like a pizza

CONS: Piece will be destroyed; cutting dust and remnants, unless care is taken, will go to waste which is money down the toilet; can be time-consuming without mechanized equipment; does not detect the presence of silver since it only affirms that the piece is solid and (maybe) homogenous


Fire Assay

Destructivity - 10
Difficulty - 8
Accessibility - 7
Equipment Cost - $2500
Service Cost - $40+
Effectiveness - 10
Value - 9
Explanation
The last LAST resort would be a fire assay. The piece is melted down and a series of special tests are performed on it. It requires an exceptionally accurate scale, a decent furnace where temperature can be controlled, and the means to make and pour ingots.


PROS: 100% accuracy and 100% fool-proof; low cost; readily available service

CONS: Piece will be destroyed


Refining

Destructivity - 10
Difficulty - 8
Accessibility - 8
Equipment Cost - $3000
Service Cost - $100+
Effectiveness - 10
Value - 8
Explanation
The other last LAST resort would be refining. You will get pure silver in the end.


PROS: 100% accuracy and 100% fool-proof; readily available service

CONS: Piece will be destroyed; refineries may not give accurate returns when they are paying out


Other Chemical Analysis

Destructivity - up to 10
Difficulty - 9
Accessibility - 8
Equipment Cost - varies
Service Cost - expensive
Effectiveness - up to 10
Value - up to 10
Explanation
Titration and its kinfolk come to mind. Sending the ingot or sample through a refining process would also qualify. Aside from refining, which is the goal of acquiring most precious metals, they are useful but not feasible for our needs.


PROS: Highly accurate

CONS: Highly advanced; requires a sample from the piece in question, much more than would be used in a scratch or drop acid test; considerable knowledge and familiarity with laboratory equipment and procedures required; expensive



Ultimately you have to answer to yourself unless you scam someone who complains, in which case it might be the authorities asking the questions. It is impossible to fool all the tests all the time. It's a matter of how far you will to go to prove what you have.

A summary of all testing methods will be presented in the next blog entry.


Posted by M: August 18, 2014


Please email any thoughts or comments regarding this post.

Previous Entry  . . . .  Next Entry


Comment Section

NOTE: Your comments will be included in this section as long as they aren't illegal. This section is censor-free so show me your intelligence or ignorance and everything in between!



2025

Four Fs of Jewelry
 
Those Are Nice Dimples
 
Yes, I Have Some
 
Good Deals
 
Transportaion Issues
 
Spining in Circles
 
Top Purchases 2024
 

2024


2023


2022


2021


2020


2019


2018


2017


2016


2015


2014




divider

(c) 2025 Metals by Mark, all rights reserved