Categories: Instruction and information
Word count/read time: 1551 words; 7 minutes
It's stamped sterling or has another known silver hallmark but you aren't convinced.
Something about it seems off: the price, condition,
weight, smell, look, feel, or another peculiarity raises your eyebrows. How can you know for certain you have real silver?
There are destructive and non-destructive ways to check.
Competency has the biggest effect in any testing method.
Tools are only as good as the mechanic - a paint brush in Dali's hand may be a keyboard duster in another's.
Therefore, some ratings could be argued a little each way.
More than one supposed expert has been duped by silver marks.
However, the number who then went on to "test it" as silver
is bothersome. Didn't the 'EPNS' stamp say it all?
Key Definitions and Explanations
Destructivity - 1-10 scale: 1 is non-destructive, 10 is annihilation
Difficulty - 1-10 scale: 1 is easy, 10 is prohibitive
Accessibility - 1-10 scale: 1 is accessible, 10 requires government clearance
Equipment Cost - Equipment or supplies necessary; in dollars
Service Cost - Cost to have a facility do it for you; in dollars
Effectiveness - 1-10 scale: 1 is unreliable, 10 is foolproof
Value - 1-10 scale: 1 is essentially useless, 10 is worth it
Explanation - Description of the test
NOTE: The above ratings assume that the given testing method is done properly!
Index of Testing Methods - Non-Destructive
Description
Destructivity - 1
Difficulty - 1
Accessibility - 1
Equipment Cost - n/a
Service Cost - n/a
Effectiveness - 5
Value - 10
Explanation
When all the information is provided by a third party, the transaction is at their mercy.
If they say it is sterling silver or real silver, take it lightly unless there is
proof.
PROS: Consider the source...are they pros?
CONS: Consider the source...are they cons? Does not detect the presence of silver.
Visual Inspection
Destructivity - 1
Difficulty - 1
Accessibility - 4
Equipment Cost - n/a
Service Cost - whatever your local appraiser charges
Effectiveness - 7
Value - 10
Explanation
Is it marked with a recognizable hallmark? Do any on-line resources help?
A thorough inspection is the best defense since you can perform one without having the item
in your presence (mostly, with good pictures).
There is a smell to silver that should transfer to your hands after a few minutes.
Eventually you will recognize color differences between pure silver,
silverplated, non-silver, and sterling silver. Real silver patina will rub off with light finger pressure. Some of the
fake silvers have patinas impervious to all but the harshest abrasives or chemicals.
Manufacturers can use thin gauge silver because it's so malleable.
Ergo, a heavy piece that is thick for no other reason than being thick is suspect.
Silver is denser than all the imitations so
its heftiness relative to size is important.
PROS: Inexpensive, most accessible
CONS: High degree of knowledge about the specific item and lots of experience required;
does not detect the presence of silver
Magnet
Destructivity - 1
Difficulty - 1
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $5
Service Cost - n/a
Effectiveness - 3
Value - 9
Explanation
Actually, there are two tests.
Use a powerful rare earth magnet. If it sticks, your item is most likely
a fake. The exception to this rule would be if a weighted item has rod inside it. However, the
magnet's attraction should reveal the
depth and size of internal structures.
The way silver interacts with magnetism is interesting, referred to as the Lenz Effect. Several metals
exhibit this property: silver, copper, aluminum, bismuth, brass, and others. There is an
observable effect when a strong magnet is nearby. Without getting
into too much detail or science, it can't be easily
measured but it can be observed with first-grade science experiments.
Then again, you get gems like this (taken from a fakebook ad):
"There is no sterling mark on it, but I have been told by an expert
that it is silver by a test that was done with a magnet." Go figure.
PROS: Hope is alive if the magnet doesn't stick; inexpensive
CONS: The highest majority of metals and alloys are non-magnetic; rarely detects the presence of silver;
especially useless on thin items
Heat or Cold
Destructivity - 0
Difficulty - 3
Accessibility - 2
Equipment Cost - $1
Service Cost - n/a
Effectiveness - 2
Value - 9
Explanation
A second non-destructive test is the ice cube or heat test, the latter working better.
Silver is the most thermally conductive element. Simply, it will transmit heat or cold fastest.
Having some known fake silver of various sizes and thicknesses is a good contrast.
Real silver will quickly attain the surrounding temperature of whatever it contacts.
PROS: Fun, cheap
CONS: Does not detect the presence of silver
Density or Specific Gravity
Destructivity - 1
Difficulty - 6
Accessibility - 6
Equipment Cost - $100
Service Cost - unknown
Effectiveness - 6
Value - 8
Explanation
A more difficult test is the specific gravity test (density is acceptable here).
You need an accurate weight and volume.
Volume is measured by fully submersing the piece in a known quantity of water and observing how much the water
is displaced.
Take the weight in grams and divide it by the volume. A volume of 112.9cc and a weight of 1175 grams would
be 10.41g/cc, a very high grade of silver if it's real.
For fake silver to have a specific gravity equal to real silver, it would require a metal heavier than silver
as its mainstay. Rule out all other precious metal, mercury, actinium, iridium, and osmium for various reasons.
That leaves lead which must be combined with other metals to lower its density.
A creative counterfeiter could make a lead-based ingot with thick silver on the outside.
PROS: Silver stands alone with its specific gravity and it is quite difficult to replicate
CONS: More advanced testing method than the casual buyer probably wants; small errors can have a drastic
impact on results; does not detect the presence of silver
XRF, Spectrometer
Destructivity - 2
Difficulty - 2
Accessibility - 7
Equipment Cost - $30,000+
Service Cost - $20-$40
Effectiveness - 2
Value - 1 (yes, it is a one)
Explanation
XRF technology uses x-ray beams. This will give false readings on heavily plated items.
Unless you have $40k to buy one or hundreds a month to rent, find a friendly scrap yard with one.
Seriously, there is no bigger waste of money or a more useless piece of equipment!
Mass spectrometers are costly, specialized laboratory equipment.
Universities may have one but they are generally not for public use.
They are well beyond the technical requirements of this article.
PROS: Quick, easy, accurate to hundredths or thousandths of a percent; minimal training;
will detect the presence of all metals or elements on the surface, not just the "good" ones
CONS: For such an expensive piece of equipment using 21st century technology,
it is SO EASILY FOOLED! Liken it to a scalpel; it can save lives
in the hands of a skilled surgeon yet wreak havoc in the hands of a serial killer. If you
don't realize the item is silverplated junk, your machine might say differently.
Item must have a flat surface large enough for the scanner to test as any leakage will void the results.
It only tests area underneath the scanner so several readings in
different locations are necessary.
Ultrasound
Destructivity - 1
Difficulty - 2
Accessibility - 4
Equipment Cost - $200+
Service Cost - unknown
Effectiveness - 9
Value - 8
Explanation
Ultrasound has been gaining some momentum as a testing tool. It will quickly
and non-destructively determine
whether the sample is fully homogenous or plated/filled. Entry-level machines can be had for under $200.
It relies on the speed of a sound wave through a material of a known thickness. Every metal
has a different value so if the display doesn't match what it should be, there is some chicanery afoot.
PROS: This might be the singular best one-stop method; somewhat easy to use, not too expensive
CONS: Requires specialized equipment but at least it's not expensive;
must have a flat surface
large enough for the probe to sit flush (most coins
and many other bullions products do not, most jewelry doesn't); only tests area underneath the probe
so several readings in
different locations are necessary; irregularly shaped items will produce strange readings (like a
cast ingot that was poured on
an uneven surface so that one side or end is thicker than the other)
Pitch/Sound
Destructivity - 2
Difficulty - 5
Accessibility - 3
Equipment Cost - n/a
Service Cost - unknown
Effectiveness - 3
Value - 9
Explanation
The "regular" sound test can be helpful in certain situations.
Listen to the sound the item makes when
you flick it or ring it. Every shape will make a different sound, will resonate differently, so
this works best with bars, ingots, coins, rounds, etc. Silver has a distinctive sound.
Dead-soft silver has a different pitch than hardened silver.
PROS: No cost
CONS: Only suitable for comparing identical items as thickness, shape, hardness, and most other factors
will affect the sound
Next entry will be the destructive ways to test for silver.
Posted by M: September 2, 2014
Please email any thoughts or comments regarding this post.
Comment Section
NOTE: Your comments will be included in this section
as long as they aren't illegal. This section is censor-free so show me
your intelligence or ignorance and everything in between!
|
2025
Four Fs of Jewelry
Those Are Nice Dimples
Yes, I Have Some
Good Deals
Transportaion Issues
Spining in Circles
Top Purchases 2024
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
|